By reader AJCien.
Now that the finals are over, this is the post-match analysis brought to you as a complement to the match reports earlier submitted.
Firstly though, I’d like to apologize to readers that I was way off the mark for most of my predictions in my earlier article.
Girls’ final – HCI vs RJC: This being a big match between both giants in A Division sports, the first half was a cagey affair as I had predicted. The nerves showed as HCI struggled to convert many of their chances. RJC didn’t fare much better with them losing possession sloppily, especially in the second quarter.
The scores were kept low mostly because HCI’s good defence smothered many close-range shots by the Rafflesians, hence restricting them to speculative long-range shots in the first quarter. But when given the chances, RJC did convert them efficiently. This was especially so in the second quarter when their rasping counter-attacks shredded the HCI defence apart. More so when the HCI girls are marooned in the middle of nowhere when they missed their shots at the other end.
The second half, though, was a half of contrasting fortunes. RJC’s physical approach may have garnered a supposedly insurmountable 15-point lead in the third quarter, especially when consecutive 3-pointers seemed to have left HCI for dead. But like their solid defence, HCI played a patient game and bided their time as RJC’s cavalier approach exposed them to injury and foul risks.
Which was precisely what happened in the fourth quarter meltdown of RJC. By utilising their free throw chances, they were able to claw back points more easily, a stark contrast to them struggling to convert their chances for most parts of the game. As for RJC, the loss of key players who could penetrate the tough HCI defence soon proved their downfall. Kudos to HCI for their spirit even when trailing by a large score.
Boys’ final – HCI vs AJC: The first half was a pretty good affair, especially with Anderson JC putting up a great fight against HCI, even when the odds were stacked against them. With their defence first, counter-attacking approach, of which I’ had predicted correctly as well, they were able to counter HCI’s attacking passing-oriented basketball effectively. Long ball tactics, though, necessarily restricted attacking chances. With HCI being tough in counter-attack as well, being able to rapidly blast their way through the AJC defence, AJC had to rely on their 3-pointers, which can be a hit-or-miss affair.
In the second half though, a high tempo game necessitates an even temper as well as a good back-up crew. HCI has both while AJC were forced to concede more fouls as the match went on. While HCI weren’t able to convert their free throws as easily as expected, AJC lost out in winning rebounds, which meant scoring chanced were at a premium for AJC. With a thin bench, AJC were also prone to impacts from loss of key players to fouls. Which is precisely what happened. HCI were then left to romp home as AJC’s game plan was left in disarray.
MVP, Shengyu of HCI stated that HCI were struggling to match AJC’s intensity in the first half, but it was a matter of time before they adapted to their tactics. As Yanming, the captain of AJC summed it up, HCI had the advantage of a squad depth, such that tactics and line-ups can be tinkered to adapt to AJC’s tactics. But the intensity of AJC was also its downfall, as they are also prone to conceding fouls, which Yanming said was the cause why they lost out in rebounds, and subsequently the match.
As it goes, it has been a very good game for all teams involved, and congratulations to HCI for winning a double. Kudos to the guys for disproving my ‘jet-lag’ theory as I’ve written in the pre-match predictions. 😉 (By the way, Shengyu thought the prediction was humorous, pretty much so for an outlandish theory.)
Pre-match report
A Division Girls Final
A Division Boys Final
There is only bad call, no siding as all the refree are fair. Don’t blame them, they are also human.
Haha.
Sorry for being arrogant, HY.
But like you said, i have nothing for me to be arrogant about.
I missed most of my shots and we even lost.
If you’re taking it at all my little gestures on the court, it’s just because i am enjoying the game in a way different from how others enjoy the game.
Losing doesn’t mean i can’t have fun.
I think most important thing is that i don’t show disrespect to my opponents in any way.
NOT in any way.
(Anyway, it was obvious that the referees made bad calls, but no use attacking AJC after we lost the game. It is only effective complaint if we WON the game. Haha.)
CHEERS!
I bet the players know the rules better than you else you’ll be the one up there. talking about tameness, look whos growling up here. the match is over, and AJC did a great job, especially #6, bet he’s been balling longer than you’ve been studying, take that, kid.
Well done to the referees for cheating so obviously and siding AJC. But sadly, the result is still a lost for AJC even after the super BIAS calls that made AJC look better. Maybe the referees and the ajc players can go read the rule book and find out what is illegal screening. From there,maybe AJC no.6 can learn that he should be more tame and less arrogant for his mediocre skills for he only look better and got his shot off due to all the ILLEGAL SCREENS. I am sure i am not the only one who notice all the these. CHEERS!
And kudos to you AJCien for the comprehensive and balanced coverage. Not easy to watch one’s alma mater get defeated, not to mention writing the report afterwards!
it doenst matter who the mvp is, what is most important is that my school retained their title and won a hat trick of a div basketball finals. really happy for the girls team, finally winning a championship after so long. keep it up!
Just wanna comment on the MVP selections, for the gals, it was quite obvious that if HC manage to fight back and win the champ, it would be either #11 or #12 getting the MVP, #11 for her constant contribution in rebounds,points and blocks while #12 for her determination and aggressiveness during great comeback early 4th quarter.
For the guys, I actually feel that there are 3 players who came close to the MVP, Shengyu, ching poh and chong lin. Chong lin started the game very well but towards the end he kind of fade off. Between Shengyu and ching poh, i feel that both players scored important shots for the team but from what i saw in the game, i feel that ching poh played a better game than shengyu who played decently well, ching poh caught numerous rebounds, create havoc in the paint which resulted several foul outs of anderson players, ching poh also came up with several big steals and being a big forward, he actually brings the up court several times. It’s not that shengyu did not play well, but i feel that ching poh deserved the MVP trophy for his great game in the finals!
[…] Basketball Finals – A Post Mortem on May 24th, 2008 12:14 pm […]