Wilbur Tan Ming Sheng (Bowen #14) finds himself heavily contested as he attempts a layup. He finished with 17 points in the victory. (Photo 5 © Chan Hua Zheng/Red Sports)
Wilbur Tan Ming Sheng (Bowen #14) finds himself heavily contested as he attempts a layup. He finished with 17 points in the victory. (Photo 5 © Chan Hua Zheng/Red Sports)
Ha ha.. The report sounds so bias…
“Bowen Secondary rode their luck “,
“Woodgrove only have themselves to blame “,
“Woodgrove proved once more why they are a force to be reckoned with.”
We respect your opinion and acknowledge that we cannot please every reader out there.
However, we do not understand some of your comments.
Firstly, “Bowen Secondary rode their luck…”
If it wasn’t for a series of breaks that went Bowen’s way on the last two possession in regulation, they would not even have had a chance to send the game to overtime. This is just a matter of fact.
Secondly, “Woodgrove only have themselves to blame…”
We concede that Bowen’s good performance must have had a part to play in this outcome and it is our mistake for using the word “only.” The report has been updated accordingly.
Thirdly, “Woodgrove proved once more why they are a force to be reckoned with…”
They have always been a good team and they showed that once again. We do not see anything wrong with this comment.
It would help if you could provide us with more details on how we can improve our story, thank you.
hi Dylan. I am not not displeased by your story. In fact I thought it was very well written.
However every reader has his right to feel what he feels after reading it, and the right to post his comments. I’ve already quoted your lines that made me feel its bias so I see no point in commenting further.
You’ve edited your article after my remarks but I seriously think you didn’t have to. You have presented the story the way you saw it and its totally fine.
So keep up the good work and regards..